Tuesday, May 31, 2011

good morning quotes

good morning quotes. Romantic Good Morning Quotes
  • Romantic Good Morning Quotes



  • GeekLawyer
    May 3, 02:33 PM
    Where I live, and with the operator I use, this isn't out of the contract though. I don't know which contract you have.You should consider yourself lucky then. This story is about places where your situation is not the case.





    good morning quotes. Funny Good Morning Quotes
  • Funny Good Morning Quotes



  • zMacintoshz
    Apr 10, 05:12 PM
    http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?id=cat13506&type=page&h=387&skuId=1000917&productId=1218207307591&viewtype=angleView&count=0
    24" dynex 1080p hd tv for $200 at best buy.





    good morning quotes. Good morning Nubia_group
  • Good morning Nubia_group



  • pudrums
    Apr 11, 05:20 PM
    21 Gramm

    http://www.cineasten.de/bilder/filme/21-gramm/l.jpg





    good morning quotes. good morning quotes for
  • good morning quotes for



  • MagicBoy
    Mar 25, 01:05 PM
    If you think that John Siracusa (or citations thereto) is a troll, then your ignorance is breathtaking. (The absence of your actually addressing the issue at hand in lieu of ad hominem attacks is conspicuous and dubious.)

    Pull the other one.



    more...


    good morning quotes. Good morning comments
  • Good morning comments



  • esaleris
    Mar 29, 10:52 AM
    This is, by far, one of the most intersting posts I've ever read. Particularly when you discovered they started connecting to your network! Can't wait to hear what happened, as well as who stole the thing.





    good morning quotes. good morning quotes for her
  • good morning quotes for her



  • Vidder
    Dec 9, 03:11 PM
    heres what i enjoyed doing best with this game:



    more...


    good morning quotes. Good Morning scraps, Good
  • Good Morning scraps, Good



  • darthraige
    Apr 26, 08:17 AM
    What do they mean they can't tell if it's real? Ok course it's a fake, look at the perspective of the screen in the top right corner of the hand photo.





    good morning quotes. good morning quotes to
  • good morning quotes to



  • dakwar
    Mar 24, 09:58 PM
    Happy B-day OSX.



    more...


    good morning quotes. good morning quotes for
  • good morning quotes for



  • BC2009
    Apr 25, 11:53 AM
    I prefer the look of this to the mockup that Josh Topolsky did on thisismynext.com -- probably because I like the look of the iPhone 4. I am ready for this device to ship since I gave my iPhone 3gs a nasty drop on concrete garage floor about a month ago -- the screen is fine, but the GPS no longer works. It's gonna be hard waiting until September.

    Still, I doubt the validity of the photos until some information is provided as to how these were obtained.

    I am a bit bummed at recent reports that QualComm's 4G/GSM/EVDO-RevA combo chip won't be ready until 2012 -- I was kinda hoping for LTE in the next iPhone -- and there is no way Apple will do an iPhone that would run through its battery in 3.5 hours (not that I would want such a device anyway).





    good morning quotes. good morning quotes. good
  • good morning quotes. good



  • CalBoy
    Apr 15, 04:21 PM
    As I said, I understood the point you were trying to make. But.... you can't take two non-TSA incidents and use those to make a case against the TSA specifically. All you can do is say that increased security, similar to what the TSA does, can be shown to not catch everything. I could just as easily argue that because the two incidents (shoe and underwear bombers) did not occur from TSA screenings then that is proof the TSA methods work. I could, but I won't because we don't really know that is true. Too small a sample to judge.

    Well actually we know the TSA methods don't work because both of the incidents were from European airports that mirror what the TSA does. Added to the number of weapons that make it through TSA checkpoints, it's easy to see that the TSA does in fact not work to the extent that it is expected to.

    Did you not read my post above? Or did you not understand it? Or did I not write clearly? I'll assume the 3rd. Past history is that bombs are not put on planes by lone wolf fanatics. They are placed there by a whole operation involving a number of people... perhaps a dozen, maybe? The person carrying the bomb may be a brainwashed fool (though, surprisingly - often educated) - but the support team likely aren't fools. The team includes dedicated individuals who have specialized training and experience that are needed to mount further operations. The bomb makers, the money people, the people who nurture the bomb carrier and ensure that they are fit (mentally) to go through with a suicide attack. These people, the support crew, are not going to like 50/50 odds.

    I understood your rather simplistic attempt at game theory just fine. The problem remains that one side is not a rational actor. The command portion of terrorists have virtually nothing to lose with a botched attempt, and neither does the fanatic patsy. A 50/50 ratio isn't good enough for our security because the downside for both command and patsy are much smaller than the upside (from their perspective). The chances of failure need to be much higher in order to effectively deter terrorists.


    You are right. There has been a cost to dignity, time and money. Most of life is. People are constantly balancing personal and societal security/safety against personal freedoms. In this case what you think is only part of the balance between society and security. You feel it's too far. I can't argue. I don't fly anymore unless I have to. But, I also think that what the TSA (and CATSA, & the European equivalents) are doing is working. I just don't have to like going through it.

    Sacrificing these things is appropriate when there is a tangible gain. There hasn't been much of a tangible gain with TSA, and this is coming from the head of Israeli Security. We're paying a lot and getting almost nothing in return. Every year there's a new "standard" put out there to make it seem like TSA is doing something, but time and again security experts have lambasted TSA and its efforts as a dog and pony show.

    Your own opinion of flying should be an example of how ridiculous things have gotten. If people now become disgruntled and irritated every time they fly, for perhaps marginal gains in security, then our methods have failed.


    Give the man/woman/boy a cigar! There is no way to prove it, other than setting controlled experiments in which make some airports security free, and others with varying levels of security. And in some cases you don't tell the travelling public which airports have what level (if any) of security - but you do tell the bad guys/gals.

    It is difficult to prove, but you can make an educated guess about what the cause is. Other than the correlational evidence, there is no other good data to suggest that TSA has actually been effective. In no field is correlation enough to establish anything but correlation.

    I cited a sharp drop-off in hijackings at a particular moment in history. Within the limits of a Mac Rumours Forum, that is as far as I'm going to go. If you an alternative hypothesis, you have to at least back it up with something. My something trumps your alternative hypothesis - even if my something is merely a pair of deuces - until you provide something to back up your AH.

    No, that's not how it works. If you want to assert your idea as correct, the burden is on you to show that it is correct. I am going to try to poke holes in your reasoning, and it's up to you to show that my criticisms are invalid on the bases of logic and evidence.

    So far you've only cited correlation, which is not sufficient evidence for causation. You ignored my criticism based on military intervention, changing travel patterns, etc, and only want to trumpet your belief that correlation is enough. It's not. If you don't want to do more on Mac Rumors, then don't post anymore on this topic concerning this line of discussion.



    more...


    good morning quotes. good morning quotes
  • good morning quotes



  • MacAddict1978
    Apr 16, 04:03 PM
    why do music companies make it so difficult to distribute their music? weird.

    It's because they wan't to make it more enticing for people to steal music instead of making it easier for them to buy it. They can sue 80 year old ladies for a $million for 1 Incubus song... (no, seriously, they did.) That's a much better haul than 99 cents right? :D

    Sounds like the Record companies are being their typical stupid selves. Only reason Apple is really able to get away with it is because they are Apple. It is not the closed system part but because they are Apple. I bet if the record company could they would say F you to Apple and pull out. I also would not be surpised if they regreat now making a deal with them when iTunes first launched.

    This stinks over all. It is not closed or open argument. This is a record company being record companies.

    iTunes made legally downloading relevant. We'd still not have a model like this if Apple hadn't done it (no one thought apple would grow to such a behmoth back at the time iTunes Store was born). We'd having something, but I doubt we'd have the flexibility of individual tracks at that price if individual tracks at all. Really, even though there is still piracy, iTunes probably saved the music industry more than it killed it IMO. And if the record labels don't like people cherry picking the 2 good songs of an ablbum, start putting out artists that have albums without filler (like that kesha creature)





    good morning quotes. Scrap maker,good morning
  • Scrap maker,good morning



  • Ygn
    Nov 6, 07:15 PM
    Is it just the zombie packs you get with the hardened edition? I already have all those on W@W, not paying for them again.

    I believe it's just the zombie maps from WaW you get.



    more...


    good morning quotes. GoodMorning.mp4 video by
  • GoodMorning.mp4 video by



  • MacintoshKat
    Apr 16, 11:26 PM
    Not only are they fake, but they're ugly.

    The SD slot is huge, it'd make the iPhone "4G" comparable to the Dell Mini 5 or whatever it's called.

    The aluminum bezel works for the iPad, and the similar design on the MacBooks. But on the iPhone? Not only would it be uncomfortable to hold for long amounts of time, but the GSM frequencies AT&T uses has a hard time going through simple walls, half the time. How would anyone expect five bars at any given time?

    With Verizon, yes, the CDMA does much better at relaying frequencies through objects, but there again, what about current AT&T customers? Do we keep AT&T, get switched over, or does Apple manage the two?





    good morning quotes. good morning greetings,good
  • good morning greetings,good



  • ten-oak-druid
    Apr 25, 12:31 PM
    It's just a small hand.



    more...


    good morning quotes. Ranbir Kapoor Say Good Morning
  • Ranbir Kapoor Say Good Morning



  • greenmeanie
    Apr 29, 01:21 PM
    If you click on the "IPAD" button you see it otherwise you wont even notice it.





    good morning quotes. Good Morning/Night
  • Good Morning/Night



  • jowie
    Apr 29, 03:53 PM
    Great news. Glad to see Apple taking a leaf out of their own guidelines... A touch OS has a different interface for a reason.



    more...


    good morning quotes. Good morning scraps - Good
  • Good morning scraps - Good



  • Hastings101
    May 3, 09:52 PM
    And I'll buy one when it comes with dual fold-out screens in a**-kicking neon colors and a choice of animal stripes, lightning bolts or fire emblems, and is sold at Wal-mart in shrink-wrapped packaging for $9.99 and has commercials featuring hot girls in bikinis jumping on a trampoline.

    In other words, we're both out of luck.

    I would buy that. I would buy two of that.





    good morning quotes. Good Morning Monday.
  • Good Morning Monday.



  • wordoflife
    Mar 24, 03:03 PM
    I never really liked OS X until 10.5.





    good morning quotes. good morning quotes with
  • good morning quotes with



  • garybUK
    Mar 10, 07:50 AM
    Apple used to innovate, right now they have acheived the goal of any capitalist company, they've hit the big time with the iPhone and are resting on their laurels.

    Notebooks / Computers, these aren't innovative, infact the PowerPC was innovative, OSX 10.1 was innovative but now... it's got to a point where they don't innovate, Intel does; Nvidia does; AMD does, apple are a box maker using the same components as everyone else.

    Apple A series mobile processors, these are innovated by ARM (spun off from Acorn, a british company). Again they don't innovate.

    Where they DO innovate is the idea of a vertical system where typically companies have gone to a horizontal view. The innovation is to capture you with something (be it a Apple TV, iMac, iPhone, iPod) and get you into their vertical structure. The innovation comes at creating a market for all possible user needs within this vertical structure, e.g. Movies, Music, Apps... where they can't make it themselves they take a cut from other developers (30% split).





    xbigman15x
    Jan 15, 04:39 PM
    Will there an update to the macbook soon or should i buy one right now, i am disappointed in the mba





    justperry
    Apr 15, 01:48 PM
    I hope this is true... I really would like to have a more rugged case design on the iPhone (planning on getting the next version). I had the 3G iPhone and the back plate always felt flimsy / fragile.

    For the antenna - could the antenna placement be put near the apple logo on the back (maybe that is plastic) or -- might there be enough antenna surface to receive through the front?

    I also wonder if they could tie an antenna to the bezel on the front of the phone, or integrate it into the aluminum enclosure on the back. Not knowing metallurgy, I am not sure if there is a way to turn aluminum to a receptive material or could the case be of an aluminum alloy to allow reception?

    No way Dude.
    All of the phones that I see open to see the internals had metal shields in the front to get less radiation from the antenna.
    It is still not proven whether or not U can get cancer from radio waves.
    But,I do know certain places where radio waves will kill U.
    Don't even come close to a very high power antenna from a radio station,a T.L. will even light up if you hold it nearby.

    Making an antenna of the aluminium casing is impossible,don't U think Apple and others would have done that long time ago:eek:





    longofest
    Oct 19, 10:26 AM
    1.5% woo hoo!! Thats quite a climb!

    Indeed. If you look at it a different way, it is a 33% increase year over year for Apple's market share numbers.

    How I got to 33%:

    % increase_________1.5
    ---------------- = ---- = 32.6%
    old market share____4.6





    bloodycape
    Jul 23, 01:06 AM
    I think along with IT support I think Apple should make their players UMS support to make on the fly transfers to and from the computer easier.





    reflex
    Nov 16, 03:59 PM
    Maybe AMDs for the low end lines and Core 2 Duo for the high end? What about a Mac Mini with dual AMD X2 for less than $400 with ATI graphic? :D

    Sort of what I was thinking. A Turion x2 or maybe an upcoming dual core Sempron (the current one runs pretty cool). Might put the mini back at a $499 starting price.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment